Paraguay adopts AI rules for courts, emphasising human oversight and transparency
Paraguay’s judiciary has introduced new rules on artificial intelligence use, with support from UNESCO, aiming to limit automated decision-making and safeguard fundamental rights.
Paraguay has introduced a regulatory framework governing the use of artificial intelligence in its judicial system, positioning AI tools as supportive rather than decision-making instruments.
Adopted by the Supreme Court of Justice of Paraguay, the policy defines how AI can be used in areas such as data processing, case management, and assisted decision-making. It requires that human actors retain full authority over judicial outcomes and that AI systems do not replace judicial reasoning.
The framework emphasises transparency and accountability. Courts are expected to disclose when AI tools are used in proceedings, particularly where such systems influence outcomes or recommendations. It also incorporates safeguards related to fundamental rights and data protection.
The approach aligns with UNESCO’s guidance on the use of AI in judicial contexts, which promotes auditability, human oversight, and lifecycle governance of AI systems.
Implementation has included technical cooperation and training initiatives to strengthen the judiciary’s institutional capacity. This reflects an effort to ensure that legal professionals can effectively assess and supervise AI tools.
The Paraguayan model illustrates a regulatory approach that integrates international standards while maintaining institutional control over automated systems, as governments increasingly explore the use of AI in public sector decision-making.
