Maldives Parliament passes controversial media regulation bill amid press freedom concerns
The Maldives passed a controversial media regulation law that critics warn could severely restrict both traditional and online media freedoms by imposing the same regulatory framework on electronic media as on traditional outlets.
The Maldivian parliament has passed a new media regulation bill that has sparked strong criticism from journalists, opposition parties, and international observers, who warn it could restrict press freedom and free expression in the country. The government, however, says the legislation is aimed at improving oversight and safeguarding constitutional rights.
The Maldives Media and Broadcasting Regulation Bill, passed on 16 September, creates a new media commission with powers to fine and suspend news outlets for content deemed to violate religious norms, national security, or public order. The commission will consist of seven members, four elected by media organisations and three appointed by parliament.
The government of President Mohamed Muizzu insists the bill is not intended to censor the press. Officials say personal social media accounts will not be regulated and that the commission cannot unilaterally shut down outlets without a judicial order. Supporters also highlight changes made to the original draft, such as requiring warrants for searches and excluding personal storage devices from its scope, as evidence of responsiveness to public concerns.
Journalists’ groups and opposition politicians remain unconvinced. The Maldives Journalists Association said the law risks placing media under government control, since parliament will have the power to dismiss commission members. The main opposition party, the Maldivian Democratic Party, described the law’s passage as a ‘sad day for democracy’ and called for protests.
Ahmed Naaif, the secretary-general of the Maldives Journalists Association (MJA), stated that ‘The Maldivian parliament has passed a draconian bill that seeks to muzzle dissent online and offline, both on traditional media and social media,’
International voices have also expressed concern. The United States Embassy urged the government to uphold freedom of expression, while the Committee to Protect Journalists called on President Muizzu to reject the bill. The Bar Council of the Maldives said the legislation requires further revision to align with constitutional guarantees and international standards.
The controversy comes at a time of political tension in the Maldives, following recent changes to the Supreme Court and ongoing disputes between government and opposition groups. While officials argue the bill is necessary to address misinformation and establish clear standards, critics fear it could open the door to censorship and increased restrictions on independent journalism.
