Digital Rights Ireland and the Irish Council for Civil Liberties warn that Ireland’s National Cyber Security Bill 2024 would grant the state extensive powers to scan networks, collect communications data in bulk, and block domain names, going far beyond what the EU’s NIS2 directive requires. The organisations caution that several provisions could undermine privacy, data protection and freedom of expression.
Derechos Digitales’ new discussion paper examines how technology-facilitated gender-based violence has become a persistent human rights concern that mirrors and deepens existing gender inequalities. Using international human rights law as its framework, the paper identifies major shortcomings in current national legislation, including inconsistent definitions, overreliance on criminal responses, weak safeguards, and limited avenues for redress. It also details how the speed, scale, and cross-border nature of digital technologies intensify harms, often silencing women and LGBTQIA+ people in public and political life. The analysis, grounded in comparative legal research and expert consultation, underscores the need for rights-based, survivor-centred approaches that address TFGBV as part of a broader continuum of gender-based discrimination.
Ofcom has published its final guidance on how digital services should address online harms that disproportionately affect women and girls. The document sets out required measures, recommended practices and new expectations for service design, transparency and victim support.
The open letter argues that the ICO’s softer stance toward public bodies has coincided with a rise in serious breaches, citing issues at the PSNI, the Electoral Commission, and other agencies. The signatories warn that weak oversight leaves the public exposed to growing security risks and undermines trust in the UK’s data governance system.
Tech Global Institute has submitted evidence to the OHCHR examining how digital and AI-enabled surveillance tools are being acquired and used in Bangladesh and India. The analysis details the growth of CCTV networks, facial recognition systems, interception tools, and targeted spyware operations, alongside longstanding questions about regulatory oversight, transparency, and avenues for redress. The submission provides case-based examples and highlights how these surveillance practices may affect the exercise of peaceful assembly and association.
The tool is intended to help the EU identify risks early, strengthen enforcement, and support the safe deployment of artificial intelligence across the Union.
The Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board has released detailed reflections on Revision 1 of the WSIS+20 Outcomes Document. The group welcomes stronger language on digital inclusion, multilingualism and the IGF mandate, but warns that key areas such as human rights, surveillance, environmental impacts and internet fragmentation have been weakened or removed.
While acknowledging that Revision 1 preserves key commitments to multistakeholder participation, international human rights law, and inclusion, the coalition warns that several protections have been weakened. It calls for restoring stronger safeguards against intrusive surveillance, protecting encryption and anonymity tools, reinforcing private-sector human rights due diligence, and addressing environmental and AI-related risks more directly.
LACNIC has launched its call for presentations for the 2026 LACNIC Technical Forum, inviting experts and practitioners from across the Internet community to contribute to the programme for LACNIC 45, scheduled for 11–15 May 2026 in Guadalajara, Mexico. The forum offers a dedicated venue for sharing operational experience and technical developments in areas such as IP network operations, routing and switching, DNS, interconnection, and IPv6 deployment. Submissions are now open for those interested in supporting regional knowledge exchange ahead of next year’s event.
The Internet Society has published its analysis of WSIS+20 Revision 1, welcoming stronger recognition of the WSIS vision, the IGF mandate and multistakeholder principles, while urging member states to address critical gaps around IGF financial sustainability and the enabling environment needed for meaningful connectivity. The organisation encourages negotiators to maintain transparency, deepen engagement with non-governmental stakeholders and reinforce commitments to an open, globally connected and trustworthy Internet.
Civil Society Alliances for Digital Empowerment (CADE) is a project co-funded by the European Union.
