Violent extremism online

The internet has become a double-edged sword: a platform for empowerment and connection, but also a tool for spreading violent extremism. Extremist groups exploit the internet to propagate ideologies, recruit followers, and coordinate activities, often targeting vulnerable populations and marginalised groups.

Online violent extremism undermines public safety, social cohesion, and democratic principles. Countering it effectively requires nuanced policies that balance security concerns with the protection of fundamental rights like freedom of expression and privacy.

Propaganda and recruitment

Extremist groups leverage social media and encrypted platforms to disseminate their narratives and recruit individuals. These efforts often exploit societal grievances or personal vulnerabilities, making it difficult to counter them effectively.

Anonymity and encryption

While anonymity and encryption are vital for privacy and safety, they can also be exploited to coordinate extremist activities or shield harmful content from detection.

Content moderation

Platforms face challenges in identifying and removing extremist content while avoiding overreach that could suppress legitimate expression. Automated moderation tools often lack context sensitivity, leading to errors and unintended consequences.

Jurisdictional issues

Extremist content often crosses borders, complicating efforts to enforce laws and coordinate responses among countries with different legal and cultural norms.

Explore how online violent extremism is addressed and the governance frameworks shaping its regulation on the Digital Watch Observatory.

Social and governance impacts

Unchecked violent extremism online can polarise societies, erode trust in institutions, and incite offline violence. Effective governance should address these risks while preserving democratic values.

Human rights considerations

Counter-extremism efforts must respect international human rights standards, including the right to freedom of expression and privacy. Overreach in surveillance or content regulation risks undermining these rights.

Global cooperation and multistakeholder approaches

Given the borderless nature of the internet, addressing violent extremism requires international collaboration and input from diverse stakeholders, including governments, civil society, and the private sector.

United Nations: The UN Security Council and its Counter-Terrorism Executive Directorate address the role of digital technologies in violent extremism. The Christchurch Call highlights multistakeholder efforts to combat online extremist content.

Internet Governance Forum (IGF): Provides platforms for dialogue on countering violent extremism while respecting rights.

Regional bodies: Organisations like the African Union (AU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) address violent extremism in broader cybersecurity and digital governance frameworks.

Private sector initiatives: Industry groups such as the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) and Tech Against Terrorism develop tools and standards to curb extremist content.

Academic and research collaborations: Networks like the Centre for Research on Extremism (C-REX) produce evidence-based approaches to addressing online extremism.

Tackling violent extremism online requires a thoughtful balance between security and rights. Civil society has a vital role to play in shaping policies and fostering inclusive digital environments resilient to extremist influences.

  • Promote digital literacy: Equip individuals with skills to identify and resist extremist propaganda, focusing on vulnerable populations.
  • Advocate for balanced policies: Ensure that counter-extremism measures uphold rights to free expression and privacy.
  • Engage with platforms: Push for greater transparency and accountability in content moderation practices.
  • Foster dialogue: Build bridges between communities to address grievances that fuel extremism and promote inclusive narratives.
Go to Top